BALAKRISHNAN A/L KALIAPPAN V SHAMEENA A/P NATHESA [2019] 5 MLJ 661
BALAKRISHNAN A/L KALIAPPAN V SHAMEENA A/P NATHESA [2019] 5 MLJ 661 Court of Appeal (Putrajaya) Claim of Matrimonial Home Facts This appeal arises from the
Take a break and read all about it
BALAKRISHNAN A/L KALIAPPAN V SHAMEENA A/P NATHESA [2019] 5 MLJ 661 Court of Appeal (Putrajaya) Claim of Matrimonial Home Facts This appeal arises from the
AKAR V SNKSH [2018] 4 SHLR 19 Syariah Court of Appeal (Selangor) Interpretation of Current Market Value of Matrimonial Property Facts 1. The parties were
MOHD SYAFIQ ABDULLAH @ TIONG CHOO TING V. DIRECTOR OF JABATAN AGAMA ISLAM SARAWAK & ORS [2016] 1 SHLR 41 High Court of Kuching (Sarawak)
SOO LI MIEN, REIKO & ORS v CHONG WEE FUNG AND ANOTHER APPEAL [2015] MLJU 2253 Court of Appeal (Putrajaya) Publication of a Defamatory Statement
TEPAT INTAN SDN BHD v MEGA FIRST CORPORATION SDN BHD [2014] 1 MLJ 573 Court of Appeal (Putrajaya) Communication of Acceptance Facts of the case
MAAMA lwn. WABR [2020] SLRHU 9 Syariah High Court of Selangor (Shah Alam) Appeal for Validation of Divorce Pronouncement Facts of the case 1.
FMZ lwn. MFAR [2016] SLRHU 14 Syariah High Court of Kedah (Alor Setar) Application For Permission To Register A Polygamous Marriage Facts of the
KEDAI PAJAK SHIN NGIEN SDN BHD v PENDAKWA RAYA [2023] 7 AMR 549 Court of Appeal Criminal law – pawnbroking business – disposal of unredeemed
DATIN SERI ROSMAH BT MANSOR V PUBLIC PROSECUTER [2021] MLJU 2394 COURT OF APPEAL (PUTRAJAYA) Stay Proceedings in Criminal Cases Facts of the case 1.
ROSLI BIN YUSOF V PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [2021] 4 MLJ Federal Court Offering Witness by The Prosecuter. Facts of the case 1. Approximately at
Fiona Rubin [The Administratrix of The Estate of Frank Harvey Frankie Riya (Deceased)] v Hermansyah Amran [2024] 5 MLRA Court of Appeal, Putrajaya Civil Appeal
Lee Sheue Ning v PP & Other Appeals [2024] MLRAU 137 Court of Appeal, Putrajaya Criminal Procedure – Trial – Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (Act
Hooman Khanloo v Public Prosecutor [2015] 5 MLJ Court of Appeal Criminal Procedure – Trial – Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (Act 234) (‘DDA’) Facts 1.
ABR v NBM [2017] 1 SHLR 47 MAHKAMAH TINGGI SYARIAH SHAH ALAM PERMOHONAN POLIGAMI Fakta Kes 1. Plaintif telah mengemukakan permohonan poligami di bawah Seksyen
DAM lwn. HM & ORS [2023] SLRAU 4 Syariah Appeal Court of Federal Territories Appeal on Harta Sepencarian (Matrimonial Assets). Facts of the case
YHMT lwn. AHMB [2022] SLRHU 3 Syariah High Court of Selangor (Shah Alam) Review of the Appointment of the Hakam Committee. Facts of the case
THE RELATION OF RES GESTAE PRINCIPLE AND THE ADMISSIBILITY OF BYSTANDER EVIDENCE IN MALAYSIA Introduction Section 3 of the Evidence Act 1950 (“EA 1950”) defines
THZA lwn AAA [2021] SLRHU 15 Syariah High Court of Selangor (Shah Alam) Review of the Reconciliation Committee Report Facts of the case 1. The Applicant
RMR lwn. MNMN [2022] SLRHU 4 Syariah High Court of Selangor (Shah Alam) Marriage Debt Facts of the case 1. This case involved a
TANG LOON PAU & ORS v MOHD SALIHIN KOTNI & ANOR [2023] 8 CLJ 105 COURT OF APPEAL Motor Insurance – Liability of insurer –
The case reviews/articles are intended to provide general information only. The contents or information provided are not intended to constitute or be construed as any professional advice on any specific matter. They should not be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice. Kindly contact us at info@monco.my if you require further assistance.